Pacific Community Water Management plus – 2 (PaCWaM+ 2)

Project summary

This project builds on the findings and relationship established during the highly productive Pacific Community Water Management plus (PaCWaM+) program, delving further into some of the key identified knowledge gaps (e.g. decentralisation trends in the WASH sector) and key findings (e.g., leveraging non-WASH networks, localising water safety planning approaches, the benefits of social marketing – not simply educational models – when supporting community water managers) and exploring new focal areas (e.g., a greater emphasis on climate-resilient WASH, the potential role of water committees and other actors to engage in local-level water resource management, and community-led water monitoring).

The team include scholars from The University of the South Pacific (Fiji and Vanuatu) and the Solomon Islands National University, and we are again partnering with numerous government agencies.

Purpose and rationale

In rural Fiji, Vanuatu and Solomon Islands, active and sustainable water committees (WCs) are the key to effective community-based water management (CWM) and thus, to climate-resilient rural water security. These countries are, to varying degrees, all currently decentralising water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) service and support systems; now is the time to assess and improve these processes. WCs must be day-to-day managers of water resources and WASH systems – adapting to chronic climate changes and preparing for acute climate hazards. However, WCs typically do not endure or function in a sustainable and proactive manner, and there are few examples of WCs engaging in wider water resource management (WRM). WCs need further capacity development with ongoing mentoring, support and motivation. Innovatively leveraging formal, informal and emerging networks – both WASH and non-WASH related – is necessary to provide this support. By non-WASH networks we specifically mean institutions such as rural-urban familial networks (formal and informal), faith based organisations (e.g. church leaders, women’s, men’s and youth groups), market associations and other agricultural networks (e.g. agricultural extension officers), chiefly councils, schools, and more. Our previous research has identified some of these non-WASH networks as important, but largely ignored, components of the wider WASH enabling environment.

Building on our earlier work and ongoing partnerships in these three countries, using both formative and action research combined with two regional knowledge sharing opportunities (two peer-to-peer learning exchange events), this research project seeks to better understand ways that government and civil society organisations (CSOs) engaged in the WASH sector can leverage formal, as well as emergent and informal networks, to further support and strengthen WCs as well as link WRM with community WCs to result in more effective, sustainable and inclusive climate-resilient WASH.

Research Questions

The overarching research question is:

In the context of increasingly decentralizing rural water management in Pacific Island countries, how can formal, informal & emergent networks – both WASH and non-WASH related – better support mobilising and strengthening water committees (WC) to be both WASH and water resource managers who engage with both community and beyond-community factors affecting climate resilience?

There are two groups of guiding sub-questions/research objectives used to address this research question, with RQ1 focused at the village/community level and RQ2 focused at the community and beyond-community level.

RQ1. How can formal, informal and emergent networks (WASH and non-WASH related) be used to improve both the prioritisation of CWM and WC-capabilities for climate-resilient water management:

1. What monitoring, reporting and capacity-building activities can decentralized government structures feasibly use to mobilise, and hold WCs to-account, to deliver climate-resilient WASH?
2. How can informal and emergent social networks, such as church-based, town-village-based, and other non-WASH networks (such as agriculture, market associations, tourism, sporting programs, education institutions) be used to further promote and support CWM?

RQ2. How can WCs be assisted by formal/informal/emergent networks to engage in water resources issues both within their community and with others in their catchment?

1. How can existing and emergent networks – both WASH and non-WASH – assist WCs to address water resource issues with others in a given catchment?
2. Can community-led monitoring of water be a feasible and effective way to motivate WCs and community collective action, to inform climate-resilient water management and support WCs to engage in WRM discussions in their catchments?

Research Approach

Research methodology consists of formative and action research activities, with some variation across the three countries – Solomon Islands, Vanuatu and Fiji – based on contextual factors, geo-specific gaps and opportunities identified in our previous work as well as consultations with relevant stakeholders (e.g. government and CSO actors in all three countries). Research activities are aligned with the afore mentioned sub-questions (RQ1a-b and RQ2 a-b).

A key component of the project is conducting formative research on decentralisation and CWM in each country (RQ1a) to better understand provincial level capacities and constraints to supporting WCs.

Following these formative research activities the results will be analysed and then socialised with key stakeholders to then co-design several pilot action research activities (i.e. the implementation of new check-lists and community engagement approaches, the piloting of alternative follow-up regimes) which will then be monitored and assessed. This design is based on a research-to-policy collaborative (R2PC) approach, which we have used in our previous projects.

Other research activities (consisting of either/or/both formative and action research) vary by country and are as follows:

1. Production of videos (everywhere except Solomon Islands, where this has already occurred) which will then be used alongside WC training and water safety planning interventions by government and CSOs (Van & FJ – at the request of water sector stakeholders). Some of this content will then be used as part of a social marketing campaign (e.g. Facebook). [RQ1b]
2. Pilot implementation and monitoring of a slightly altered Drinking Water Safety & Security Planning (DWSSP) intervention in five communities (by MHMMS), drawing on a DWSSP supplementary guide produced in the earlier PaCWaM+ project (based on formative research and consultations with MHMMS staff, but not implemented due to COVID-19) (FJ only)[RQ2a&b]
3. Formative research on climate change impacts (primary FJ), followed by the production of guidance that may be incorporated into the government’s current DWSSP activities [RQ1a&b]
4. Literature review and some formative research exploring the potential of community-level water monitoring by WCs in the Pacific context (all countries). This may include some pilot activities and action research (depending on review and consultations) in Fiji [RQ2a]
5. Formative research on the potential of incorporating church and customary governance networks to support the prioritisation of CWM and WRM (SI, Van, FJ) [if funds allow, this may include an action research activity with select churches in Solomon Islands, following consultations conducted in September last year] [RQ1a&b]
6. Formative research on the potential to connect CWM with agricultural and other non-WASH networks (e.g. market associations, eco-tourism association, schools) in terms of utilising these networks to support WCs [Van, FJ]. This may include some low cost action research activities (dependent on results and funds) [RQ2a]
7. Formative research on the barriers and opportunities for WCs to be engaged in beyond-community WRM (FJ, Van) [RQ1b & RQ2b].